|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: smurf attack
On Mon, Dec 07, 1998 at 07:19:50AM -0500, John Fraizer put this into my mailbox: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Yet another example of how IRC is a complete and total waste of bandwidth. Please, let's not start this pointless argument again. If IRC weren't around, the weenies would be hanging out on ICQ or java chat; or if chat weren't around, they'd communicate via e-mail and file transfer, or via teleconferencing systems (hacking PBXs). Just like in the 70s/80s. Imagine that. IRC isn't the reason for all the weenies; it just happens to be where they hang out at the moment. (One might say that's an indication of its success.) Your mention of this is more of a waste of bandwidth than IRC is. How about doing something proactive and blaming the real cause for the problems (say, poor upbringing, insecure ISPs, etc), not one of the symptoms? IRC networks don't encourage their users to hack any more than large ISPs encourage their users to spam. If you're going to comment, comment on how we can get smurf relays to fix their networks. Don't gloat; it's not professional. -dalvenjah -- Dalvenjah FoxFire (aka Sven Nielsen) "Flower children are just Founder, the DALnet IRC Network petal pushers" e-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.dal.net/~dalvenjah/ whois: SN90 Try DALnet! http://www.dal.net/
|