North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
> Remember these aren't nameservers that serve 5 domains, figure tens of > thousands. Perhaps I am not being clear. Reloads, even a HUP, cause > named, even the new version, to pause for a while before being able to > serve requests again. That will change in 8.1.2++, btw. "ndc" will use a socket, not signals. > All the relevant nameservers for the domains would > have to be reloaded 300 times a day in this case. It isn't good if named > stops responding that often because it slows access to the web sites > domains by inserting a dropped DNS query timeout every time the reloading > server is queried (50% or 33% depending on 2 or 3 nameservers. If the > reload takes 30 seconds then reloading 300 times == each nameserver is > down for 150 minutes a day. Not good. Not bad, either. This is why we have slave servers. > Or do you suggest delaying client domain name registrations 24 hours? I always put a zone up on the master before I send in the registration. If the slaves take a day or so to catch up I can live with that. -- Paul Vixie <[email protected]>
|