North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: WCCP talk..
That I can accept. But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure true and absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own health. My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other cache manufacturers do it properly also? > I haven't yet encountered a situation where the cache was having a problem > and yet was still responding and talking WCCP to the router. > > When our Cache Engines have experienced problems, they have removed > themselves from the available pool or stopped responding to WCCP (which, > in turn, caused them to be removed). > > In short, I believe there's a very strong mechanism to check all > functions of the cache before saying "hey, I'm okay here". > > /cah > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am. Alex Rubenstein, [email protected], KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
|