North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Despamming wholesale dialup

  • From: Derek Balling
  • Date: Fri Oct 30 18:12:59 1998

There are solutions available to this problem, the primary one being the
"smtp-after-pop" hack that is widely available and fairly widely used.

Essentially, issuing a STAT command opens up an SMTP relay window for
<admin-definable> minutes, whereupon if the user hasn't issued another STAT
in the mean time [e.g. they logged off] the "hole" goes away.

We were using that at my last job and it works just fine.

At 12:38 PM 10/30/98 -0600, Phil Howard wrote:
>Bryan Bradsby wrote:
>
>> Block port 25 (only) from all "open modem banks" (TM) to my SMTP servers. 
>> If implemented on a large enough scale, the modem user will be
>> 'encouraged' to use the SMTP server supplied with their account. Make each
>> dialup customer go through, and be authenticated by their own SMTP server. 
>
>I think I see an additional problem creeping in here.
>
>The question is whether a dialup user should use the SMTP server of the
>facility provider, or of the ISP that actually resells the account.  You
>could have virtual ISP resellers with no facilities at all, but lets take
>a look at a small ISP that does have facilities, and is reselling dialup
>to a national provider so his local business customers can have roaming
>access without calling an 800 number.
>
>If the small ISP opens their SMTP server to the IP addresses of the big
>national dialup provider, which they would have to do in order to be able
>to handle that roaming customer who could be just about anywhere, will
>they not also be opening themselves up to being a relay for any spammer
>that uses any reseller of that national provider?  Will not such spammers
>then have access to every ISP doing reselling via that national one?
>
>I think the SMTP server that should be used when dialing that national
>provider is the SMTP server provided by that national provider, unless
>some kind of VPN is used (to be more technically correct, use the SMTP
>server of the provider of IP addressing).
>
>Roeland's issue still applies when the dialup customer is using his domain
>name as the FROM/REPLY.  But if the national provider SMTP servers accept
>any domain name in the FROM/REPLY, and just log the reality as it sees it
>in the header (e.g. dialup port and time which can be cross checked with
>the access logs), then anyone can use these dialups, and spammers won't
>get an advantage of being able to spew their filth to other than the SMTP
>server of the dialup provider.
>
>-- 
> --    *-----------------------------*      Phil Howard KA9WGN       *    --
>  --   | Inturnet, Inc.              | Director of Internet Services |   --
>   --  | Business Internet Solutions |       eng at intur.net        |  --
>    -- *-----------------------------*      philh at intur.net       * --