North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: WARNING: AOL is hosed (again)

  • From: Blake Willis
  • Date: Fri Oct 16 18:08:34 1998

Of course, these measures can only help but so much if your hostmaster
blindly acks every peice of NIC mail that comes his way... 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blake Willis           					703-448-4470x483
Network Engineer, New Customers				[email protected]
CAIS Internet, a CGX Communications Company
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Phillip Vandry wrote:

> > > If yes to my second question, then the tracking numbers either need to be
> > > made much longer and randomized or a one time pass phrase (session key) 
> > > needs to be added to the acknowlegement form. 
> > 
> > You can actually set a domain name so that it cannot be changed, by
> > any template, by any modification, correct guardian or NOT.
> 
> Sounds like a nonreversible setting to me. What if you need to change it?
> 
> Anyway, I think that by default, the update goes through automatically,
> a positive acknoledgement is ignored (default behaviour) and a negative
> acknowledgement is honored. (Which means AOL should have been able to
> stop it).
> 
> Then there is the setting where the update will not go through by default,
> and a positive acknowledgement is required.
> 
> As to whether it all works as advertized (and PGP auth too?), who knows?
> 
> -Phil
>