|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IGPs in use
I'd have to definatly disagree. IGP wise, EIGRP is easy and fast and it works. If ou need a *lot* of interoperability, use OSPF. Friends don't let friends use BGP as an IGP On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Megatron wrote: > > I would say the most interior Routing Protocol that is out there is > BGP. It gives a better control of route announcements. > > -Megatron > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Andre' Zehl wrote: > > > > Is there an overview on what the dominantly used interior routing > protocols are percentagewise in large AS backbones (IBGP, OSPF, IGRP, > EIGRP, IS-IS, any?). I don't want to start religous wars on what's the > best protocol, I'm rather interested if there is an overview available > on the facts of protocols used. Is there an "objective" > (vendor-independent) feature-based overview on the compared > advantages/disadvantages (especially regarding redistribution) of the > various protocols that goes with those numbers? > > Andre' > > > [email protected] > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs. October 26-28, 1998, Atlanta, GA. Three days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and brightest. http://www.ispf.com/ for information and registration. Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am. Alex Rubenstein, [email protected], KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834 Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
|