|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP allocations, renumbering, and RFC 2050
You're missing the point. RFC2008 is the one which recognizes legacy delegations as providing ownership (and therefore property rights). -- -- Karl Denninger ([email protected]) http://www.mcs.net/~karl I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization. On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:36:06AM +0000, Bradley Reynolds wrote: > > But seriously I would suggest that you would have some expectation > > of rights due to RFC2050 as much as any properity rights exist for > > so called legacy addresses. > > > After taking a cursory glance at RFC2050, i happened upon > the ambiguous and unintelligable wording 'best current > practice'. Even though the definition of this term was thoroughly > obfuscated, i did not find LAW or JESUS SPAKE preceding any > of the edicts contained within the mentioned rfc. > > > > At any rate it sounds like a unilaterial contract change by CW, > > which may be unenforcable. I'd just continue to announce the > > more specifics for 6 months just to make it as difficult as possible > > for CW to re-use them. > > > No one will listen to your announcements because you don't matter. > > > It won't win CW and friends that's for sure. (hello AGIS/Net99, anyone?) > > > you don't need friends when people _need_ to reach your network. > > > > On an operationally related question: > > Do grammar and nanog go hand-in-hand or is nanog becoming (has always > been?) a forum for the functionally illiterate? > > BR > >
|