North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [YA] Fwd: Class B Purchase

  • From: Kim Hubbard
  • Date: Tue Oct 06 20:17:14 1998

> 
> > I also think the registries should actually be registries and
> > not try to be the Internet's mommy.
> 
> IMHO it is part of an IP registry's job to make sure that applications for
> IP address space meet the publicly agreed upon criteria. And if that
> criteria says that you need to justify the quantity of addresses you
> receive, it may be mommy work but it is necessary work. But I want to know
> why ARIN cannot simply issue an appropriately sized portable block of
> addresses to anyone who is legitimately multihomed? Why can't ARIN
> maintain a register of companies who are multihomed and tag their IP
> allocations, of whatever size, as "portable". I suppose we could sidestep
> Sprint and use the swamp addresses which Sprint filters on a /24 boundary.
> But why can't we just carve off a chunk of 214/8 and "register" it to
> organizations who need portable space in chunks smaller than /19?
> 
> This just makes too much sense to me.

Michael,  

Could you define "legitimately multihomed" please?  

Kim

> 
> --
> Michael Dillon                 -               E-mail: [email protected]
> Check the website for my Internet World articles -  http://www.memra.com        
> 
>