|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement
On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, John Curran wrote: > At 11:00 AM 08/24/1998 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > >... > >Except, John, that you ignore the fact that you have basically required > >anyone who wants to put a high-bandwidth server on your network to accept > >other people writing a blank check for them, regardless of the legitimacy > >of the hits they receive. > > Owen, > > Clarify... right now, many organizations with high-speed connections > to the Internet pay based on usage (including traffic sent). Doesn't > anyone on a usage-sensitive leased-line connection pay based on the > traffic regardless of the "legitimacy" of the hits received? Isn't > this why we all hunt down SMURFers? Everytime we have been SMURFed BBN/GTEI has been unwilling to do anything to help us. Either filters or aiding in hunting down the SMURFer. My experience is BBN doesn't help it's customers trace down SMURFers. -- Tracy Snell (312) 588-2900 President, EnterAct, L.L.C. http://www.enteract.com [email protected]
|