|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BBN Peering issues
Yep. What comes with this is that Exodus and the rest of the world have the freedom to inform our customers and the public in general of (1) what we ascertain the situation to be, (2) how we analyze it, and (3) what we recommend that customers of both Exodus and BBN do in response. Whether the rest of you like it or not. -- -- Karl Denninger ([email protected])| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost On Sun, Aug 16, 1998 at 02:58:19PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > Thanks for the reality check. Whether the rest of us like it or not, > you're right. > > Bill Goldstein > Senior Internet Specialist > AT&T > [email protected] > TEL:(412)642-7288 > > ---------- > From: shields > Sent: Sunday, August 16, 1998 3:59 AM > To: mark > Cc: shields; nanog > Subject: Re: BBN Peering issues > > > fundamentally important that these ideals be extended to the future > of > > the Internet, if it is to have a future. No company should have the > > right to force another to pay for connectivity simply because the > latter > > has not been around since the beginning or they are not a telco. > > BBN is answerable to their customers and shareholders and not to your > or my ideals of how the Internet should work. > -- > Shields, CrossLink. > <<File: Re_ BBN Peering issues.TXT>> > >
|