|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: transparent caching....
Paul, I am not surprised that your box is the only one that *got it right*. Having a clue has *always* been the advantage of the internet, and I think you hit that category ;) Talk has always been cheap. Paul Vixie wrote: > > [email protected] (Mike O'Dell) writes: > > > I've been talking myself blue in the face for some time now > > trying to convince the never-ending parade of would-be > > cache builders that busting a gut to be "completely > > transparent" was simply not worth the effort because i was > > convinced it would turn out to be a bug and not a feature, > > especially when people had to troubleshoot problems. > > I have come to agree with this, in the large. But it was and > remains an interesting technical problem, and I feel strongly > and proudly that our box was the only one that got it *right*. > -- > Paul Vixie > La Honda, CA "Many NANOG members have been around > <[email protected]> longer than most." --Jim Fleming > pacbell!vixie!paul (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)
|