North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: renumbering and roaming
> On Mon, 18 May 1998, Blake Willis wrote: > > > Would it be terribly unreasonable to suggest assigning a reserved /24 > > explicitly for internal ISP services such as those listed below, and write > > up some sort of rfc for the whole ordeal, so that there are no conflicts > > with 1918 space? > > > > -Blake > > Anyone care to co-author an RFC suggesting a sensible global standard for > "local" mail relays, time servers, resolvers etc so that dial-in people can > roam without getting filtered, blocked etc? How about defining 192.x.y.port-number, where port-number is the port number of the service. 192.x.y.53 is the DNS server, etc.. Nah, good idea, but too many useful services with port numbers > 255, so it doesn't work too well. -Phil
|