|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: renumbering and roaming
Would it be terribly unreasonable to suggest assigning a reserved /24 explicitly for internal ISP services such as those listed below, and write up some sort of rfc for the whole ordeal, so that there are no conflicts with 1918 space? -Blake --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blake Willis 703-448-4470x483 Network Engineer, New Customers [email protected] CAIS Internet, a CGX Communications Company --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 18 May 1998, Ben Buxton wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 10:59:16AM +0100, Paul Mansfield wrote: > > > > On Sun, 17 May 1998, Michael Dillon turned on his computer and typed: > > > On Sun, 17 May 1998, Michael K. Smith: > > > > > > IMHO every dialup customer from every ISP in the world should use > > > 192.168.254.1 for their DNS address and this number should be hard coded > > > as the default in all client software. Then this problem would go away. > > > > if all ISPs agreed to use these addresses... say > > - TWO resolvers, e.g. 192.168.254,1 and 192.168.253.1 > > - two mail relays, e.g. 192.168.254.5 and 192.168.253.5 > > - two news servers, e.g. ---254.9 and 253.9 > > - two ntp time servers > > - etc etc > > Of course, if a customer has a LAN out the back of the same machine > they're connecting from, and it's using these addresses (which > they are entitled to use), then it'll cause immense headaches.. > > -- > Ben [email protected]_____ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L > Zip's Network Dude /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ > Carbon: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually > Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288 Paper: 92475276 v the best :) >
|