|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AT&T NOC?
> > >I'v fired of an email to [email protected] but havent got anything yet. > > >Is this the correct address for their NOC or should I try > >elsewhere? > > "This" referring to '[email protected]' and not '[email protected]'. > I think it was plain from his message ("I need to contact them" > instead of "I need to contact you", etc) that he understood > that '[email protected]' isn't the address for AT&Ts NOC. I'd better cover my reputation here and pipe in that yep, I _know_ what nanog is for..hell, I've been on it for a while..I figured that rather than wait for however long incase [email protected] wasnt right, I'd ask here to make sure it wasnt some BOFH redirection to /dev/null, esp as it was a pretty hair-on-fire situation... And yes the situation's in hand regarding the bogus routes..and at&t arent the cause...but the fact that some major NSPs arent filtering 61/8 at /19 as they probably should be is another question... -- Ben [email protected]_____ o _ _--_|\ ZIP Internet P/L Zip's Network Dude /____|___|_)________/______\______________________ Carbon: 9270-4777 | . \_.--._* Virtually Silicon: 9273-7111, 9247-7288 Paper: 92475276 v the best :)
|