|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Someones being naughty again...
The upstreams should certainly be filtering this. I am truly surprised someone is still leaking a ten/8 network to the world. Alex On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 [email protected] wrote: > No, you should definetly not be able to ping it. Where are you in > respect to home.net? If you are not directly connected to home.net and if > you can ping that IP, then @home is trying to advertise 10.0.184.0 to > their upstreams and they are accepting those advertisments. If you are > on home.net then you will be able to see them. That is definetly wrong > though! I can see if you use 10.x net for un-advertised touch-down nets > between two routers, but you should definetly not be able to ping them > from afar. > > On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote: > > :Pinging ? [10.0.184.34] with 48 data bytes > :Statistics for 10.0.184.34 > :12 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 50% packet loss > :round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 117/123/141 > : > :This is wrong.... > : > :I should not be able to do this! > : > :M. > : > > -- > Regards, > > Jason A. Lixfeld [email protected] > System Administrator [L5] [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > TUCOWS Interactive Ltd. o/a | "A Different Kind of Internet Company" > Internet Direct Canada Inc. | "FREE BANDWIDTH for Toronto Area IAPs" > 5415 Dundas Street West | http://www.torontointernetxchange.net > Suite 301, Toronto Ontario | (416) 236-5806 ext 18 (T) > M9B-1B5 CANADA | (416) 236-5804 (F) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >
|