North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Someones being naughty again...

  • From: Fancy Feast
  • Date: Sat Mar 14 13:26:54 1998 
All 10.x.x.x networks should be filtered by all competent upstreams.
The same goes for 127 and 224 ;)

is NAT that hard to configure?

Alex


On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Marc Hurst wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > No, you should definetly not be able to ping it.  Where are you in
> > respect to home.net?  If you are not directly connected to home.net and if
> > you can ping that IP, then @home is trying to advertise 10.0.184.0 to
> > their upstreams and they are accepting those advertisments.  If you are
> > on home.net then you will be able to see them.  That is definetly wrong
> > though!  I can see if you use 10.x net for un-advertised touch-down nets
> > between two routers, but you should definetly not be able to ping them
> > from afar.
> > 
> 
> No, I'm definitely not part of the @home net. I'm coming in off a dial-up 
> of an independant ISP in Toronto (UUnet/Sprint feeds I believe...).
> 
> M.
>