North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Internic busted

  • From: William Allen Simpson
  • Date: Tue Feb 24 12:10:58 1998

If you are happy with the proposal that NSI continue to be the monopoly
registrar, for an extra 2 years, then do nothing.

Otherwise, perhaps you would be willing to send _your_ anecdotal
experience to someone that could do something about it: your government
minister, your US Congressional Representative or Senator, or the
persons that schedule hearings on these matters.

If a US person or company, you might want to send a short note ASKING
for the House Science committee (probably the technology sub-committee)
to meet to review the NSF/NSI imbroglio, or ASKING for the House
Commerce committee to review the Magaziner proposed Rule.  Here are the
general contacts:

  James Sensenbrenner
  Science Committee
  2320 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

  Connie Morella
  Science Technology sub-committee
  2319 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

  Thomas Blyley
  Commerce Committee
  2125 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

  John Dingell
  Commerce Committee
  2125 Rayburn
  Washington DC 20515

[email protected]
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32