North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: How to document threats from pro or anti spam terrorists?
I got almost a dozen emails regarding this subject. Fine. To get this and other non-operations topics off nanog I have setup [email protected] To subscribe send email to: [email protected] Unsubscribe works the same way. We use ezmlm. Dirk On Mon, Feb 23, 1998 at 07:07:19PM -1000, NetSurfer wrote: > > I took a look at your main web pages and didn't see any reference to an > Acceptable Use Policy etc. What is your policy on spamming from your net > or hosting spammers? (Since you brought up the subject :-) > > On Sat, 21 Feb 1998 [email protected] wrote: > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: How to document threats from pro or anti spam terrorists? > > X-mailer: Mutt 0.84e > > > > Is there any consensus on how to document threats from anti-spam > > or pro-spam terrorists in a legally usefull format? > > > > This message is colored by just having received threats from one of > > the more violent anti-spammers. Apparently a client of one of our ISP > > clients sent out an advertisement for CPUs' or something like that. > > > > I went to the anti-spammer home page. Ouch. Its full about how > > guns are cool and usefull. What the benefits of *really* sharp knives > > are. Scary. Can't decide whether its a total psycho or just trying > > (with success) to project that image. > > > > As much as I personnally wish for SPAM to just go away, it has to > > be up to the legal system to sort that out. > > > > We don't do dialup, so I guess we haven't seen much of this yet. > > There really are two terrorist groups here. Spammers and > > nti-Spammers. > > > > Dirk > > > > > > > - > James D. Wilson > [email protected] >
|