|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Broken domain statistics...
Additionally there is a problem where the InterNIC refuses to remove DNS
entries even when the DNS site requests it. For example:
# whois cyberpromo.com
Cyber Promotions, Inc (CYBERPROMO-DOM)
8001 Castor Avenue Suite #127
Philadelphia, PA 19152
US
Domain Name: CYBERPROMO.COM
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Wallace, Sanford (SW1708) [email protected]
215-628-9780
Billing Contact:
Wallace, Sanford (SW1708) [email protected]
215-628-9780
Record last updated on 24-Jan-97.
Record created on 26-Apr-96.
Database last updated on 12-Feb-98 04:16:59 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS7.CYBERPROMO.COM 205.199.2.250
NS5.CYBERPROMO.COM 205.199.212.50
NS8.CYBERPROMO.COM 207.120.46.30
NS9.CYBERPROMO.COM 209.40.15.21
# whois 205.199.2.0
AGIS/Net99 (NETBLK-NET99-BLK4)
3601 Pelham
Dearborn, MI 48124
Netname: NET99-BLK4
Netblock: 205.198.0.0 - 205.199.255.0
Maintainer: AGIS
# whois 207.120.46.0
New Mellenium Cafe (NETBLK-NEW-MEL) NEW-MEL 207.120.46.0 -
207.120.46.63
Both AGIS and New Millenium would glady have the entries dropped if they
could. Particularly since New Millenium is not able to use the
207.120.46.30 to date due to anti-spam attacks :-(
On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Phillip Vandry wrote:
> From: Phillip Vandry <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
>
> I agree that the Internic should check nameservers before putting up a
> domain, even though it's more resource intensive. In addition to
> controlling speculators, it might just prevent or at least detect
> honest mistakes.
>
> The CA-Domain registration authority used to do this but I don't think
> they do it anymore.
>
> While they're at it, I should be able to NAK a registration or domain
> modification so that it is cancelled if I don't want it on my nameservers.
>
> -Phil
>
-
James D. Wilson
[email protected]
|