North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: test Nets being routed?
I also sent this particular route to the bit bucket (Null0) at NAP.NET having not hear back from inc.net..... -Steve. Matthew D. Lammers wrote: > The issue from our side has been fixed...I have word that "default" has been > killed off. Also, noteworthy, that since we weren't getting these routes via > BGP, filters didn't do much. > > Thanks! > > -Matt. > > Randy Bush wrote a while back: > < > < > and 192.0.0.0/24 > < > or 22.214.171.124/24 > < > or 126.96.36.199/24 > < > > < > these prefixes (and delegation points) are valid or potentially valid > < > in the routing system > < > < and someday, with enough marketing thrust, pigs could fly. with as many > < large isps filering these prefixes as there seem to be, and for good > < historic reason, my advice would be to bet on the pigs. rosenantes is > < getting nackered. > < > < and once again, what the heck is a 'delegation point' in bgp/routing? > < rfc/document reference, please? > < > < randy > < > < > > -- > Matthew D. Lammers -- NetSet Internet Solutions, Inc. > http://www.netset.com/