|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Address Reclaimation
> > Send the following form to [email protected] & [email protected], > > changing the $NET_PREFIX to the network being returned. > > (yes, the below is a different situation than the original poster) > > And what exactly do you do if you have a small block (eg. /22) that you > have zero use for anymore and want to get rid of but it is not allocated > directly from the InterNIC but rather out of another provider's block (a > /16 in this case)? As one of the grim-reapers of address space I'd like to point out a change that should get placed into Phils RFC and an offer to the nanog community. [email protected] is likely to be moot real soon now and Kims response that this should change to [email protected] is a viable replacement is almost ok. However I'd point out that under the terms of the InterNic award, they were the NIC of first and last resort. I don't beleive this is the case with ARIN. Two, and perhaps of interest to members of this list, I'm collecting prefixes again for reclaimation. I've done the traditional /8 space twice and 192.0.0.0/8 once. Now I'm willing to track any/all prefixes that you beleive should be returned. I've already got a list of traditional /16s that folks think should be returned and some /24s as well. I'll even do this for small blocks as well. -- --bill
|