|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchange points.
Hi, Craig, that's all been done, cisco verified the troubles and anomalies here on-site, all info has been transmitted to them now for months. The BUGid description is worded incorrectly as I said, so you can't really glean meaningful info from just the description. I opened that ticket and it has been very frustrating indeed. You're right, it's a valuable tool however it is verifiably broken in certain instances. I was just cautioning anyone who needed to count on it. Happy holidays! Best regards, David Van Allen - FASTNET(tm) / You Tools Corporation [email protected] (888)321-FAST(3278) http://www.fast.net FASTNET - Business and Personal Internet Solutions > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig A. Huegen [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 1997 10:35 AM > To: Dave Van Allen > Cc: 'Paul Thornton'; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchange points. > > On Wed, 26 Nov 1997, Dave Van Allen wrote: > > ==>We find log-input to very unreliable and often producing wrong > ==>information. It indeed operates differently across the 11.1 train > (no > ==>comment on 11.2 offered) I think 11.1.15 breaks it badly. Albeit > ==>improperly worded and not well defined in print on CCO, please > reference > ==>cisco BUGid CSCdj40503 prior to trusting log-input for any valid > info. > > CSCdj40503 simply fixes a problem where packets are not logged under > certain conditions. It doesn't change any information. > > I've never seen a problem with log-input reporting bad information; if > you > have and can reproduce, please document and contact your normal > support > channels to fix this valuable tool. > > /cah |