|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, John Frangie wrote: > Tom Glover wrote: > > > > Oh, Christ. Not again. This never ending argument about BIND doesn't have > > any place on NANOG. Please take it somewhere else. > > > > On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Bob Allisat wrote: > > > > > At 6:42 PM -0800 11/24/97, Paul A Vixie wrote: > > > >How much do I have to pay to keep him in jail forever? > > > > > > Hmmm... A question we may be > > > asking about you, your BIND > > > monopoly and the way you've > > > been a co-conspirator in all > > > these monopoly moves. Seems > > > like Paulie doesn't want anyone > > > in his sandbox. Can Paulie spell > > > "anti-trust"? > > > > > > > > > > > > TeleVirtually Yours, > > > > > > Bob Allisat > > > > > > Director, World TeleVirtual Network http://www.wtv.net > > > PO Box 191 St E Toronto Canada M6H 4E2 [email protected] > > > (416) 534-1999 http://www.wtv.net/portfolio.html > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Tom > > > > It has about as much reason to be on nanog as roasting Eugene does. > Where is your complaint about this? > > John Frangie > The BIND argument has been played out before ad nauseum on NANOG and I see no point in going through it again. That was my point. I'm quite sure that the list will roast Eugene to the same nauseous extent and then we can all complain about that too. But you are correct in that I see no justification for either being on NANOG. -- Regards, Tom ________________________________________________________________________ | "The Egg Domain" | "An engineer without a manager, | | [email protected] | is like a fish without a bicycle." | | http://www.egg.com/ | | | | |
|