North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Current prefix length filtering
On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Forrest W. Christian wrote: > The real question I have for nanog is who is filtering on 209/8 for > prefixes longer than /18? I'm quite concerned about connectivity to the > customers I'm going to have to put in this /19. Have all the major > providers started filtering on /19's or am I going to have major problems > with this block? Most people who filter recently allocated part of 192/2 space filter on /19s. Sprint originally filtered on /18s but relaxed that to coordinate better with registry allocation policies. -dorian
|