Beginning November 01 1997
Messages: 848
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

St�phane Jacquet

• 11/13/97 [no subject]
  

Aaron Beck

• 11/18/97 dear bog
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

Aaron France

• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Abha Ahuja

• 11/29/97 Re: RADB problems
  
• 11/28/97 RADB problems
  
• 11/27/97 Re: RADB not accepting updates?
  
• 11/26/97 Re: RADB not accepting updates?
  

Adam Alexander

• 11/22/97 AT&T Emergency 24hr Contact
  
• 11/02/97 Eugene Kashpureff Arrested for Wire Frau
  

Adam Hersh

• 11/11/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 New MAE-EAST
  

Adrian Bool

• 11/20/97 Re: Netflow IP accounting and IP protoco
  

Adrian Chadd

• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/17/97 Talking about spam and stuff..
  

Al Roethlisberger

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/10/97 Re: Announcing The New "MAE-EAST"
  
• 11/05/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Alan Barrett

• 11/23/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

Alan Hannan

• 11/28/97 Re: Private interconnects
  
• 11/28/97 Re: Cisco config generator
  
• 11/16/97 please stop discussing spam on NANOG
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

Alec H. Peterson

• 11/11/97 Re: better pay attention to holubs listi
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Notes from the October 1997 meeting
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Notes from the October 1997 meeting
  

alex

• 11/19/97 Re: Real..Live...SPAM
  
• 11/18/97 spam factory
  

Alex Bligh

• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/22/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Alex Kinch

• 11/18/97 Re: dear bog
  
• 11/09/97 Re: Hello? This one is wierd.
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Did I really get spammed from this m
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Did I really get spammed from this m
  

Alex P. Rudnev

• 11/28/97 Re: Cisco config generator
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/09/97 Hello? This one is wierd.
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/02/97 Hello, MAE-East?!
  
• 11/01/97 Hello, mci?
  
• 11/01/97 Re: OK.
  

Allan Chong

• 11/09/97 Re: How to use Cisco's NAT
  

Amanul Haque

• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

andrew khoo

• 11/20/97 need assistance at PAIX for maewest conn
  
• 11/20/97 ISP.au
  

Aodhan H.

• 11/22/97 Re: AT&T Emergency 24hr Contact
  

Avi Freedman

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/19/97 I put out CSU card that was on fire (fwd
  
• 11/10/97 PSInet - iSTAR purchase
  
• 11/09/97 Re: BGP4 code source
  
• 11/07/97 Re: BGP/Multihoming
  
• 11/07/97 Re: BGP/Multihoming
  

Barry James

• 11/18/97 Global Telecommunications Traffic Statis
  
• 11/11/97 Re: ACSI policy and performance impresse
  

Barry Shein

• 11/19/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  

barton

• 11/09/97 Re: How to use Cisco's NAT
  

bcurnow

• 11/21/97 Re: Land Protection for Cisco
  

Bill Becker

• 11/01/97 Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

Bill Gates III

• 11/17/97 OWNED
  

blast

• 11/21/97 Re: new TCP/IP bug in win95 (44BSD port)
  
• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

bmanning

• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/20/97 Re: Netflow IP accounting and IP protoco
  
• 11/07/97 Re: Announcing The New "MAE-EAST"
  
• 11/05/97 Re: zone transfers
  
• 11/04/97 zone transfers
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

Bob Allisat

• 11/27/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/26/97 RE: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/26/97 RE: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/24/97 Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

Bob Collie

• 11/13/97 GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Bob Izenberg

• 11/04/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  

Bradley Dunn

• 11/20/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  
• 11/05/97 Re: Communities
  
• 11/05/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  

Bradley Reynolds

• 11/20/97 Keynote Humor
  
• 11/19/97 db-admin
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Inbound prefix filters
  
• 11/12/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Communities
  
• 11/01/97 Communities
  

Brendan M Coffey

• 11/21/97 Re: whois.internic.net
  
• 11/21/97 new TCP/IP bug in win95 (fwd)
  

Brett Frankenberger

• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

brett watson

• 11/20/97 Re: Netflow IP accounting and IP protoco
  

Brian Horvitz

• 11/30/97 Cat5500/Core6000/?
  
• 11/14/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/14/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/14/97 NAP Solutions
  

Brian Tackett

• 11/04/97 Re: A First Byte of IPv8
  

Bruce Robertson

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

Charles Sprickman

• 11/26/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund (fw
  

Charley Kline

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

Chase Giles

• 11/10/97 RE: Spamming?
  

Chris A. Icide

• 11/26/97 Remove from NANOG was Re: Eugene Kashpur
  
• 11/18/97 Kaiwan.com a SPAM Source?
  
• 11/18/97 MAE-East work?
  
• 11/04/97 Lost transciever adapter
  

Chris Caputo

• 11/19/97 Announcement - a Seattle exchange is now
  

Chris Cook, Net Asset LLC

• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Chris MacFarlane

• 11/12/97 Re: Cleveland<->Toronto UUNET..
  
• 11/10/97 Re: PSInet - iSTAR purchase
  

Christian Nielsen

• 11/18/97 OWNED (fwd)
  

Christofer Hoff

• 11/18/97 Re: NANOG mailing list charter
  
• 11/13/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  

Chuck Davisson

• 11/24/97 Re: Sprint problems
  

cll

• 11/14/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Colin \"evey\" Eve

• 11/17/97 Re: WorldCom/MCI Merger - Backbone Monop
  

Craig A. Huegen

• 11/26/97 RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  
• 11/07/97 Re: Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Hello, mci?
  

csilva

• 11/07/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  

Curtis Brown

• 11/17/97 Re: Legal Issues on Blackholeing
  

Dale Drew

• 11/02/97 Re: Hello, mci?
  

Dalvenjah FoxFire

• 11/19/97 Re: NANOG mailing list charter
  
• 11/17/97 After hours contact numbers...[was: Re:
  

Dan Hubbard

• 11/24/97 Sprint problems
  

Daniel MacKay

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

Daniel Reed

• 11/19/97 Re: WTF?
  
• 11/17/97 Re:hmm -- Get a load of this. Fwd'd
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Talking about spam and stuff..
  

Danny McPherson

• 11/12/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/09/97 Re: Hello? This one is wierd.
  

dannyman

• 11/26/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund (fw
  
• 11/25/97 Re: AOL trouble?
  
• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

Darin Fisher

• 11/21/97 RE: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

Dave Crocker

• 11/26/97 Re: I'm sorry...
  
• 11/18/97 Re: evaluation of the IWG on DNS
  

Dave Geurs

• 11/09/97 IPv8
  

Dave Rand

• 11/17/97 Re: Has spam factory dakotacom.net moved
  
• 11/04/97 Operational issues: AS10297 leaking rout
  

Dave Van Allen

• 11/28/97 Cisco config generator
  
• 11/26/97 RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/26/97 RE: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  

david

• 11/18/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

David Carmean

• 11/26/97 Subject lines (was Re: Eugene Kashpureff
  

David H. Holtzman

• 11/18/97 Re:ns4.internic.net was returning false
  

David Holub

• 11/11/97 Re: better pay attention to holubs listi
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

David M. Meyer

• 11/26/97 RADB not accepting updates?
  
• 11/04/97 route-views.oregon-ix.net back up
  

David R. Conrad

• 11/26/97 Re: President's Day
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

David S. Holub

• 11/29/97 Re: Private interconnects
  

David Schiffrin

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

David Shaw

• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  

Dax Kelson

• 11/18/97 Email/mailing list abuse....
  

Dean Anderson

• 11/26/97 RE: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/24/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/19/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  

Declan McCullagh

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

Deepak Jain

• 11/14/97 LifeSpan of the MAEs?
  
• 11/10/97 Full Duplex OC-48 line cards w/ routing?
  
• 11/07/97 Re: Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or
  
• 11/04/97 Re: Operational issues: AS10297 leaking
  

Dennis Simpson

• 11/04/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  
• 11/04/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  
• 11/04/97 tcsender email bombing
  

des

• 11/02/97 Did I really get spammed from this maili
  

Dirk Harms-Merbitz

• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Dorian R. Kim

• 11/29/97 Re: wait before you flame
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Sprintlink problems?
  
• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  
• 11/11/97 Re: Current prefix length filtering
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Dorn Hetzel

• 11/19/97 Re: dear bog
  

Doug Davis

• 11/05/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  

Edward S. Marshall

• 11/27/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

Edward Vielmetti

• 11/05/97 Re: zone transfers
  

Ehud Gavron

• 11/18/97 Re: Has spam factory dakotacom.net moved
  

Eric D. Madison

• 11/11/97 WorldCom - Schedule Maintenance (fwd)
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

Eric M. Carroll

• 11/18/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

Eric Osborne

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  

Eric Sobocinski

• 11/17/97 Re: Legal Issues on Blackholeing
  

Eric Wieling

• 11/11/97 ACSI policy and performance impressesion
  

Erik M. Bataller

• 11/11/97 Re: better pay attention to holubs listi
  

Erik Sherk

• 11/07/97 Re: Announcing The New "MAE-EAST"
  

Ex-Support Wench

• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Forrest W. Christian

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/29/97 Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/15/97 Re: AS 7058 route announcements.
  
• 11/12/97 Announcing new route (What besides BGP?)
  
• 11/11/97 Current prefix length filtering
  

Gary E. Miller

• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

gary flynn

• 11/12/97 Re: I don't want to crash the 'net
  
• 11/12/97 Re: I don't want to crash the 'net
  

Gary Zimmerman

• 11/10/97 RE: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  

Geoff Huston

• 11/11/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  

Geoff White

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

George Herbert

• 11/26/97 I'm sorry...
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

George J. Broadfoot III

• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Gerald Andrew Winters

• 11/21/97 Re: whois.internic.net
  
• 11/19/97 Re: db-admin
  
• 11/18/97 Re: Oooops
  

Gerald Winters

• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  

Gordon Cook

• 11/28/97 Private interconnects
  
• 11/18/97 evaluation of the IWG on DNS
  
• 11/14/97 RE: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/11/97 better pay attention to holubs listing o
  

Greg A. Woods

• 11/24/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Boy are we off-topic...was Re: Spam
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

Greg Simpson

• 11/17/97 Re: hmm..
  

Gregory Mirsky

• 11/14/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 11/22/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/22/97 Re: Land and Cisco
  
• 11/22/97 Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/18/97 Re: evaluation of the IWG on DNS
  
• 11/16/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/13/97 Re: your mail
  

Harold Willison

• 11/12/97 AS 7058 route announcements.
  
• 11/06/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  

Havard.Eidnes

• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

Henry Kilmer

• 11/14/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Henry Linneweh

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/24/97 Re: CERT mailing list
  
• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  
• 11/18/97 Re: triplets...
  
• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Legal Issues on Blackholeing (was AG
  
• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Howard C. Berkowitz

• 11/11/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/08/97 Re: BGP/Multihoming
  
• 11/08/97 Re: BGP/Multihoming
  
• 11/08/97 Re: BGP/Multihoming
  

J.D. Falk

• 11/21/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/19/97 Re: dear bog
  
• 11/18/97 Using Procmail to stop repeats (was Re:
  
• 11/18/97 Re: After hours contact numbers...[was:
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Talking about spam and stuff..
  
• 11/16/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/10/97 Re: Spamming?
  
• 11/08/97 Re: IPv4 + IPv8 Addressing
  
• 11/04/97 MAE-East update
  

Jake Khuon

• 11/23/97 Slides from the Interprovider Ops BOF at
  
• 11/17/97 Re: RADB dead?
  

James A. Farrar

• 11/20/97 Re: Proper procedure to change route adv
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Communities
  

James D. Butt

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/19/97 Re: WTF?
  
• 11/18/97 Re:hmm -- Get a load of this. Fwd'd
  
• 11/17/97 Re: After hours contact numbers...[was:
  
• 11/17/97 hmm..
  

James K. Hood

• 11/15/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

James Rishaw

• 11/23/97 Re: CERT mailing list
  
• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  

Jamie Rishaw

• 11/11/97 Summary: UUNET..
  
• 11/11/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/11/97 Cleveland<->Toronto UUNET..
  

Jamie Scheinblum

• 11/09/97 RE: BGP4 code source
  

Jay R. Ashworth

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/26/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/21/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/16/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/12/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/11/97 Potentially dangerous Pentium bug discov
  
• 11/09/97 Re: take a look at this
  
• 11/08/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/06/97 Re: YKYBHTLW
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: MAE-East update
  
• 11/05/97 fwd: RealPlayer 5.0/Linux (from RedHat-A
  
• 11/04/97 Re: A First Byte of IPv8
  
• 11/04/97 Re: A First Byte of IPv8
  
• 11/04/97 Re: Sausage making, SS7 and protocols
  
• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Did I really get spammed from this m
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Hello, mci?
  
• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Problems with specific routing polic
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Boy are we off-topic...was Re: Spam
  

Jay Stewart

• 11/05/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  

Jeff Swinton

• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  

Jeff Williams

• 11/27/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/27/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/27/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

Jeffrey C. Ollie

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Jeremy Porter

• 11/19/97 Re: dear bog
  
• 11/19/97 Re: OPERATIONAL Question - Spamblock pro
  
• 11/11/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Jerry Scharf

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Jim Brackman

• 11/22/97 Re: looking to solve a business problem
  
• 11/22/97 looking to solve a business problem
  

Jim Browning

• 11/24/97 RE: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/10/97 RE: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

Jim Fleming

• 11/12/97 RE: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/08/97 IPv4 + IPv8 Addressing
  
• 11/08/97 Looking at IP Addresses Differently
  
• 11/05/97 IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/04/97 A First Byte of IPv8
  

Jim Shankland

• 11/21/97 Re: Land Protection for Cisco
  

jodi

• 11/26/97 RE: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

Joe Shaw

• 11/27/97 Re: Cisco Cache Engine
  
• 11/24/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/23/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/21/97 Re: "LAND" Attack Update (fwd)
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Ascend GRF
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Joe McDonald

• 11/13/97 GTE to Acquire Genuity
  

Joe Provo - Network Architect

• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  

John A. Tamplin

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/11/97 Inbound prefix filters
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

John Bashinski

• 11/27/97 Update on land.c and Cisco
  
• 11/22/97 Updated notice on Cisco and land.c
  
• 11/22/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/21/97 Field Notice: TCP loopback DoS Attack (l
  

John Curran

• 11/29/97 Re: Private interconnects
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/14/97 RE: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

John Frangie

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

John Hawkinson

• 11/24/97 Re: why not peer with LS disabling netwo
  
• 11/23/97 Re: why not peer with LS disabling netwo
  
• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

John J. Buxbaum

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

John Leong

• 11/20/97 Re: more keynotification
  

John MacQueen

• 11/12/97 [no subject]
  

John Meylor

• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  

John R Levine

• 11/20/97 Anyone planning to peer with these guys
  
• 11/17/97 Has spam factory dakotacom.net moved fro
  

John R. Levine

• 11/16/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/11/97 Re: ACSI policy and performance impresse
  

John-David Childs

• 11/04/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  

Jon Lewis

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Talking about spam and stuff..
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/05/97 Re: tcsender email bombing
  
• 11/01/97 Re: to control spam let's break the net?
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Thoughts on spam control
  

Jorge Amodio

• 11/16/97 Source info for spam
  

Joseph T. Klein

• 11/29/97 Re: wait before you flame
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  

Josh Beck

• 11/14/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Josh Richards

• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

Jun (John) Wu

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Justin W. Newton

• 11/28/97 Hot town on Old town?
  

k claffy

• 11/27/97 new pretty pictures of address space vis
  
• 11/25/97 caching at windmills (i mean exchange po
  
• 11/21/97 keynotefootnote (it looks like i can't g
  
• 11/20/97 more keynotification
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  

Karl Denninger

• 11/29/97 Re: Private interconnects
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/24/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/19/97 Re: OPERATIONAL Question - Spamblock pro
  
• 11/19/97 Re: dear bog
  
• 11/18/97 OPERATIONAL Question - Spamblock protoco
  
• 11/18/97 Re: Kaiwan.com a SPAM Source?
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/04/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Ken Harris

• 11/21/97 Land Protection for Cisco
  
• 11/17/97 Re: hmm..
  

Kent W. England

• 11/20/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/20/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/14/97 RE: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/11/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/11/97 Re: Announcing The New "MAE-EAST"
  
• 11/08/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/07/97 Announcing The New "MAE-EAST"
  

Kevin Houle

• 11/10/97 MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

Kevin Oberman

• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  

Kirby Files

• 11/02/97 Re: Communities
  

Larry Vaden

• 11/12/97 Re: ACSI policy and performance impresse
  

Leigh Porter

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/18/97 Re: triplets...
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/07/97 Re: Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or
  

Leo Bicknell

• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

Leo Seto

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

Linda Winkler

• 11/19/97 Re: routing to 147.73/16
  

loans

• 11/16/97 Business Loans For You
  
• 11/01/97 Business Loans For You
  

Luke Parrish

• 11/16/97 Re: please stop discussing spam on NANOG
  

Lyndon Levesley

• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/23/97 why not peer with LS disabling networks
  

Mail Administrator

• 11/17/97 Mail System Error - Returned Mail
  

Majordomo

• 11/17/97 Welcome to nanog
  

Marc Hurst

• 11/26/97 RE: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/24/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/18/97 triplets...
  
• 11/17/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/10/97 Re: PSInet - iSTAR purchase
  

Marc Slemko

• 11/18/97 ns4.internic.net was returning false aa
  
• 11/18/97 ibm.net subscriber faking mail/subscript
  

Marcel Schoenbeck

• 11/13/97 Re: your mail
  
• 11/12/97 Trying again, QoS for IP networks???
  
• 11/12/97 [no subject]
  

Marcos Della

• 11/09/97 How to use Cisco's NAT
  

marilyn-request

• 11/18/97 [no subject]
  
• 11/17/97 Re: unsubscribe
  
• 11/17/97 archive retrieval: posting.guidelines
  
• 11/17/97 archive retrieval: list.info
  
• 11/17/97 Re: subscribe
  

Mark E Larson

• 11/11/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

Mark E. Larson

• 11/27/97 Re: Cisco Cache Engine
  
• 11/12/97 Re: AS 7058 route announcements.
  

Mark Evans

• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/20/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  

Mark Milhollan

• 11/26/97 Living in a disfunctional list (Was Re:
  
• 11/21/97 Re: "LAND" Attack Update (fwd)
  
• 11/19/97 Outage mailing lists
  

Mark Prior

• 11/29/97 Re: RADB problems
  
• 11/29/97 Re: RADB problems
  
• 11/27/97 Re: RADB not accepting updates?
  
• 11/17/97 RADB dead?
  

Mark Tripod

• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/06/97 Ascend GRF
  

Martin Hannigan

• 11/28/97 Re: Cisco config generator
  
• 11/26/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  
• 11/18/97 Re: MAE-East work?
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Ascend GRF
  
• 11/04/97 Re: MAE-East update
  

Mat Miller

• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  

Matthew D. Lammers

• 11/13/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  

Matthew Pearson

• 11/12/97 Re: I don't want to crash the 'net
  

Matthew Silvey

• 11/21/97 LAND attacks
  

mec

• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Michael Behrens

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

Michael Bostardi

• 11/24/97 RE: Sprint problems
  

Michael Dillon

• 11/17/97 Re: WorldCom/MCI Merger - Backbone Monop
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/17/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  

Michael Gibson

• 11/25/97 AOL trouble?
  
• 11/10/97 Re: PSInet - iSTAR purchase
  

Michael McArthur

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

Michael R. Poyaoan

• 11/05/97 BGP/Multihoming
  

Mike Gibbs

• 11/03/97 Re: Hello, MAE-East?!
  

Mike Leber

• 11/14/97 Re: AS 7058 route announcements.
  
• 11/14/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  

muljawan

• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

Naiming Shen

• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Nanog Maillist

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

nanog-l

• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

Nathan Bates

• 11/25/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  

Nathan Stratton

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/10/97 RE: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/03/97 Re: Hello, MAE-East?!
  

Neil J. McRae

• 11/25/97 Re: why not peer with LS disabling netwo
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchan
  
• 11/12/97 Well done Sprint!
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI WorldCom Inc.
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Ascend GRF
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Ascend GRF
  

NetSurfer

• 11/15/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/10/97 AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

Network Operations Center

• 11/24/97 Re: why not peer with LS disabling netwo
  
• 11/14/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  
• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  

Nicholas Bastin

• 11/29/97 Re: wait before you flame
  
• 11/29/97 wait before you flame
  
• 11/29/97 ipv8
  

Nikos Mouat

• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Noel Chiappa

• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Owen DeLong

• 11/24/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  

Pam Ciesla

• 11/04/97 NANOG 11 Registration Refund
  

Pascal Petit - SYNET

• 11/27/97 Cisco Cache Engine
  
• 11/12/97 Load sharing on BGP on C75xx
  

Paul A Vixie

• 11/27/97 Re: Cisco Cache Engine
  
• 11/24/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/19/97 Re: dear bog
  
• 11/18/97 Re: evaluation of the IWG on DNS
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/06/97 Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or merg
  
• 11/05/97 Re: MAE-East update
  
• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/02/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

Paul D. Robertson

• 11/21/97 Re: Land Protection for Cisco
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Paul Ferguson

• 11/24/97 Re: why not peer with LS disabling netwo
  
• 11/22/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/12/97 Re: I don't want to crash the 'net
  
• 11/11/97 Re: better pay attention to holubs listi
  
• 11/10/97 MCI WorldCom Inc.
  
• 11/09/97 Re: How to use Cisco's NAT
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/06/97 Geographic v. topological address alloca
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/06/97 Re: BGP/Multihoming
  
• 11/05/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Paul Flores

• 11/17/97 Re: Legal Issues on Blackholeing (was AG
  

Paul G. Donner

• 11/13/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  

Paul Lantinga

• 11/07/97 Re: Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or
  

Paul Love

• 11/04/97 Re: MAE-East update
  

Paul Thornton

• 11/25/97 Advisory - tunneling of IP at exchange p
  

Pedro Marques

• 11/04/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Pete Ehlke

• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  

Peter Evans

• 11/18/97 OWNED [spam - dont follow up to this one
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

Peter Galbavy

• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Phil Howard

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/30/97 Re: wait before you flame
  
• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/28/97 Re: Cisco config generator
  
• 11/28/97 Re: Cisco config generator
  
• 11/25/97 no more domain talk
  
• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  
• 11/11/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Ascend GRF
  
• 11/05/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  
• 11/04/97 Re: A First Byte of IPv8
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 mailing lists for SPAM topic
  

Phil Lawlor

• 11/18/97 General spam issues
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

Phil Wood

• 11/17/97 routing to 147.73/16
  

Phillip Vandry

• 11/05/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Postmaster

• 11/21/97 FW: Notification: Inbound Mail Failure
  

QUINN, Paul

• 11/28/97 RE: Cisco config generator
  

r.a. martin

• 11/20/97 Re:
  

Ran Atkinson

• 11/03/97 IPsec processing & NAT (was Re: moving t
  
• 11/03/97 Overloaded semantics (was Re: moving to
  

Randall S. Benn

• 11/10/97 Re: How to use Cisco's NAT
  

randy

• 11/17/97 WorldCom/MCI Merger - Backbone Monopoly?
  

Randy Bush

• 11/27/97 are your routers having a hot time tonig
  
• 11/26/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/26/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund (fw
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/23/97 Re: why not peer with LS disabling netwo
  
• 11/23/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/22/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/14/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Announcing new route (What besides B
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: zone transfers
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Reid Fishler

• 11/18/97 Agis - Still Spam Central
  

Richard Irving

• 11/18/97 Oooops
  
• 11/06/97 Re: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Richard Welty

• 11/13/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  
• 11/12/97 new facility for nanog mailing list
  

Rik Schneider

• 11/13/97 Re: new facility for nanog mailing list
  

Rob Wilson

• 11/19/97 Re: Real..Live...SPAM
  
• 11/18/97 Real..Live...SPAM
  

Robert A. Costner

• 11/18/97 SPA Spam - Please send me a copy
  

Robert Bays

• 11/09/97 Re: How to use Cisco's NAT
  

Robert E. Seastrom

• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

Rodney Joffe

• 11/23/97 RE: GB Ethernet switches
  
• 11/23/97 GB Ethernet switches
  
• 11/18/97 NANOG mailing list charter
  
• 11/18/97 AOL reporting problems
  
• 11/14/97 RE: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/06/97 RE: IPv8 < IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 RE: moving to IPv6
  

Ron Broersma

• 11/19/97 Re: routing to 147.73/16
  

Ron Buchalski

• 11/09/97 Re: How to use Cisco's NAT
  

Roy

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

salnot patrice

• 11/09/97 BGP4 code source
  
• 11/09/97 BGP4 code source
  

Sanjay Dani

• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  

sasaki

• 11/17/97 Re: RADB dead?
  

Scott Huddle

• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Scott Stults

• 11/21/97 Hardware
  

Scott VanRavenswaay

• 11/18/97 Re: NANOG mailing list charter
  
• 11/18/97 Re: NANOG mailing list charter
  

Scott W Brim

• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Sean Donelan

• 11/30/97 Re: Horrible Service Agreements
  
• 11/24/97 Re: Land and Cisco question
  
• 11/21/97 OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/19/97 Re: opening tickets with peers
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/16/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/13/97 Exchange point Cross-Matrix updated
  
• 11/11/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/07/97 Re: Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/04/97 Sausage making, SS7 and protocols
  

Sean Doran

• 11/21/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  

Sean M. Doran

• 11/23/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/17/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/11/97 Re: Ascend GRF
  
• 11/11/97 Re: /19 addresses and redundancy
  
• 11/11/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/11/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/11/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/11/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: Communities
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

security-alert

• 11/29/97 Another update on land.c and Cisco
  

Sharif Torpis

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  
• 11/05/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  
• 11/05/97 Architectural Solutions to Internet Cong
  

Shaun S. Amini

• 11/09/97 take a look at this
  

Sheryl Chapin

• 11/21/97 CERT mailing list
  
• 11/13/97 Wow! Totally overwhelmed!
  
• 11/12/97 I don't want to crash the 'net
  

Simon Leinen

• 11/25/97 Netflow IP accounting and IP protocol nu
  

SK Miller

• 11/14/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Snowdog

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  

Stan Barber

• 11/29/97 Re: RADB problems
  
• 11/21/97 Re: OPS: SECURITY new packet of death
  
• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/02/97 Re: Notes from the October 1997 meeting
  
• 11/02/97 Notes from the October 1997 meeting
  

Stan Hanks

• 11/17/97 Re: Legal Issues on Blackholeing (was AG
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  

Steve Blair

• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  

Steve Camas

• 11/05/97 /19 addresses and redundancy
  

Steve Carter

• 11/17/97 Re: Has spam factory dakotacom.net moved
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  

Steve Feldman

• 11/26/97 Re: RADB not accepting updates?
  

Steve Sobol

• 11/20/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/16/97 Re: please stop discussing spam on NANOG
  
• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  
• 11/05/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  

Steve Waddington

• 11/09/97 RE: How to use Cisco's NAT
  

steven hessing

• 11/20/97 Netflow IP accounting and IP protocol nu
  

Steven Schnell, Sprint Corporation

• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/05/97 Re: MAE-East update
  

stickybit

• 11/04/97 Re: MAE-East update
  

Susan R. Harris

• 11/18/97 Re: Building a moderated nanog (was Re:
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Talking about spam and stuff..
  

T.P.Brisco

• 11/07/97 Re: Cyberpromotions plans to acquire or
  

Thomas Narten

• 11/05/97 Re: Overloaded semantics (was Re: moving
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/03/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Tim Gibson

• 11/11/97 Re: PSInet - iSTAR purchase
  

Tim Harrison

• 11/18/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/17/97 Re: hmm..
  
• 11/10/97 Re: PSInet - iSTAR purchase
  

Tim Ramsey

• 11/17/97 Building a moderated nanog (was Re: hm..
  

Tim Salo

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/24/97 Switch-Based Interconnects
  
• 11/24/97 ATM Switches (was: New MAE-EAST)
  
• 11/14/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/06/97 Re: New MAE-EAST
  
• 11/01/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

Todd R. Stroup

• 11/18/97 Re: MAE-East work?
  
• 11/04/97 Re: Operational issues: AS10297 leaking
  
• 11/04/97 Re: Operational issues: AS10297 leaking
  
• 11/04/97 Re: Operational issues: AS10297 leaking
  

Tom Eastgard

• 11/14/97 RE: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Tom Glover

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  
• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

Tom Hubina

• 11/11/97 IP Forwarding
  

Tony Bates

• 11/28/97 The Cidr Report
  
• 11/21/97 The Cidr Report
  
• 11/14/97 The Cidr Report
  
• 11/10/97 Re: The Cidr Report
  
• 11/07/97 The Cidr Report
  

Tony Li

• 11/21/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/20/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/17/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/17/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/16/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/14/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  
• 11/06/97 Re: Architectural Solutions to Internet
  

Tony S. Hariman

• 11/20/97 Re: Proper procedure to change route adv
  
• 11/20/97 Re: Netflow IP accounting and IP protoco
  
• 11/20/97 Proper procedure to change route adverti
  

Tony Torzillo

• 11/20/97 Palo-Alto Dallas routing problem
  

Turnando Fuad

• 11/22/97 Re: Sprintlink problems?
  
• 11/21/97 Sprintlink problems?
  
• 11/13/97 Re: GTE to acquire Genuity
  

Vadim Antonov

• 11/21/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/21/97 Re: Geographic v. topological address al
  
• 11/20/97 Re: Anyone planning to peer with these g
  
• 11/18/97 Re: dear bog
  
• 11/17/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/14/97 Re: NAP Solutions
  
• 11/13/97 Re: Well done Sprint!
  
• 11/07/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/02/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Vijay Gill

• 11/12/97 Re: Potentially dangerous Pentium bug di
  
• 11/01/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  

Wayne

• 11/14/97 Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers
  
• 11/11/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  

Wayne Bouchard

• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid?
  
• 11/10/97 Re: MCI Accepts Worldcom's Bid? ; charse
  
• 11/09/97 Re: take a look at this
  
• 11/03/97 Re: OK.
  

william

• 11/10/97 Earlier e-mail
  
• 11/10/97 Spamming?
  

William B. Norton

• 11/25/97 Important: NANOG List Changes
  
• 11/24/97 President's Day
  
• 11/21/97 Important: NANOG List Changes
  

William Church

• 11/25/97 Re: Eugene Kashpureff's Defense Fund
  

William Duncanson

• 11/21/97 whois.internic.net
  
• 11/19/97 WTF?
  

William Wong

• 11/05/97 Re: zone transfers
  

Winfried Haug

• 11/18/97 .DE Zone corrupted !!!!
  
• 11/14/97 Press-Release: Support model of the Inte
  
• 11/09/97 Re: moving to IPv6
  
• 11/01/97 Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  

Yakov Rekhter

• 11/03/97 Re: NAT etc. (was: Spam Control Consider
  

z9ljj7

• 11/25/97 [no subject]
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month