|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NAP Architecture
On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 09:30:59AM -0800, Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI wrote: > Yes, by competition. A smaller telco should offer a better rate at nearby > sites. However, then you loose whatever you invested in getting a rack at > each NAP. Well, yeah; but I think the question was: how do they justify that price? Anything _more_ useful than "what the amrket will bear"? > --Ben Kirkpatrick > "Consciousness: that annoying time between naps." This wasn't an _intentional_ pun, right? :-) > PS: Probable ELI OC192 cut 25miles south of Seattle (again). Who's laying > new fiber on the I-5 corridor and running us over? _192_? Wow. Even _I_ don't make mistakes that big... Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [email protected] Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "Pedantry. It's not just a job, it's an Tampa Bay, Florida adventure." -- someone on AFU +1 813 790 7592
|