|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
On Oct 28, Martin Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > As a customer with separate ISP connections for business and personal use, > I would pay, as a feature, for SPAM blocking that was managed by my ISP. I > believe ALL your major business customers would pay to have SPAM blocked > from delivery to their employees. I really don't want to get into moral arguments on NANOG, but this one I really take issue with. <SOAPBOX> Specificially, I feel that it is Very Very Wrong[TM] to charge people so that they don't receive messages that almost everybody agrees should not be sent to them in the first place! If the spammers had not been allowed to run rampant for as long as they currently have (and we all know who let them do that), this would not even be considered a viable option. </SOAPBOX> ********************************************************* J.D. Falk voice: +1-650-482-2840 Supervisor, Network Operations fax: +1-650-482-2844 PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net "The People You Know. The People You Trust." *********************************************************
|