North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
In article <[email protected]>, Dorian R. Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 8 Oct 1997, Steve Meuse wrote: > >> At 09:11 AM 10/8/97 -0700, Michael Dillon wrote: >> >I understand that it is not to everyone's benefit to filter on the /19 >> >boundary like Sprint does but it seems to be prudent to adopt a /8 filter >> >on most of the old class A space and a /16 filter on the old class B space. >> >Other than the need to update these filters as the former class A space is >> >subdivided I can see no major downside. >> > >> >Comments? >> >> What about the cable providers that have chunks of 24/8? > >62/8, 63/8 and 64/8 are being assigned now. Not quite, part or all 62/8 is being assigned by RIPE NCC in Europe, and they don't give out smaller netblocks than /19's. We have 62.216/19 for example. The not smaller than /19 is common policy of RIPE btw. Mike. -- Miquel van | Cistron Internet Services -- Alphen aan den Rijn. Smoorenburg, | mailto:[email protected] http://www.cistron.nl/ [email protected] | Our vision is to speed up time, eventually eliminating it.
|