North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: not rewriting next-hop, pointing default, ...
> LSR is actually a significant security issue. So, while I do > understand and am sympathetic to the operational debugging > issues that LSR addresses, I think that requiring a peer to > enable LSR more than 2 hops inside their network from the > outside world is unreasonable. So, you're comfortable with asking for LSR at the IX and a hop behind? > In a world where SSH were available in cisco routers and/or > IPsec were more widely deployed, I might have different views. K5 does not give you sufficient warm fuzzies? randy