North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: too many routes
On Wed, Sep 10, 1997 at 09:11:55PM -0400, Sean M. Doran wrote: > Sanjay Dani <[email protected]> writes: > > There are backbone providers and there are providers of specialized > > ISP or hosting or security etc. services that need independent* IP > > address space and do not have to waste resources on building a private > > "backbone". > > NAT. Perhaps I misunderstood Sanjay, Sean, but I believe his concern was that the addresses _not be the property of an upstream (ie: backbone) provider_ to provide flexibility of connection choice. NAT will not solve this problem; it resides at too low a level of the theoretical architecture, being used primarily to avoid renumbering of internetworks. This isn't a network numbering problem, it's a routing problem. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [email protected] Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "People propose, science studies, technology Tampa Bay, Florida conforms." -- Dr. Don Norman +1 813 790 7592
|