North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: ICMP Attacks???????
On Mon, Aug 25, 1997 at 11:59:46PM -0700, Joe Rhett wrote: > Your idea is to waste CPU cycles to prevent people from reading the manual. No; they're not readong the manual _anyway_. > > I've yet to have anyone explain to me why adding a requirement to tell > > the router that a given port has other routers behind it, instead of > > hosts, "won't work in many, many implementations"... by which I assume > > you mean many networks, rather than many router brands. > > You obviously fail to understand corporate networks. Since corporate > networks are still 90-9?% of the router business, your requirements for > what the 'Net needs are irrelevant. I'd be interested in the source of that statistic... and I thought the primary focus of NANOG was on networks which _were_ part of the Internet, but then... > > Pointers? [ reply... at which point it becamse as apparent to me as it was to the rest of y'all that I was fighting out of my weight ] > Real code, real purpose, real function. Not code to prevent people from > reading the manual. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [email protected] Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "People propose, science studies, technology Tampa Bay, Florida conforms." -- Dr. Don Norman +1 813 790 7592