North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: UUNET - PSI - ?
Oh, I'm sorry. This was a technical issue. You know. One national provider advertising the /16 of another national provider's *backbone*. Sorry. I'll refrain from such things like this in the future. I forgot. Today was an odd-numbered day. Can't talk tech on nanog. Shame on me. :-P > >> Something wrong with this? > >> > >> sho ip bgp 22.214.171.124 255.255.0.0 > >> BGP routing table entry for 126.96.36.199/16, version 533944 > >> Paths: (2 available, best #2, advertised over IBGP) > >> 174 > >> 188.8.131.52 from 184.108.40.206 > >> Origin IGP, metric 30, localpref 100, valid, external > >> Community: 2548:668 > >> 701 > >> 220.127.116.11 from 18.104.22.168 (22.214.171.124) > >> Origin IGP, metric 2, localpref 100, valid, external, best > >> Community: 2548:668 > >> > >> *174*? > > > > What's really criminal is that neither of them have NOCs. > > >From private mail I received, it is clear that I was being too subtle. > > UUNET and PSI have perfectly fine NOCs. The problem was that Jamie seems > not to know how to use them and posts to nanog in stead. > > Folk, it is no longer safe to assume that clueful folk from provider X read > this list. They have been driven off by the noise. Some weeks back, folk > on a private list asked for anyone who still read nanog to copy over any > useful message. None have been copied. This one certainly won't be. :-) > > randy > > > PS: This is an actual bug. I do not think PSI has bought UUNET. > -- jamie g.k. rishaw dal/efnet:gavroche IAGnet/CICNet/netILLINOIS 'whois JGR2' for PGP keyID/Fingerprint __ Network Operations/TSD DID:216.902.5455 FAX:216.623.3566 \/ 800.637.4IAGx5455 "The machine's fine. It just doesn't work." [email protected]