|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: .COM on the move...
NSI, _as stated in their published five-year plan_, appears to be on its way towards RFC 2050 complaince by continuing the separation of gTLDs and the root zone. Since J is the first letter for root-only servers, J is apparently also being used as the first letter for gTLD-only servers (bad choice IMHO). Where is the confusion? Wait, nevermind... This is NOT an operational problem Jim, get your DNS politics OFF nanog. Stephen At 08:14 08-05-97 -0500, you wrote: > >Just in case people have not noticed... > >---------- >From: Richard J. Sexton[SMTP:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, August 04, 1997 6:30 PM >To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Part of the open process? > >I'm curious about this: > >;; AUTHORITY RECORDS: >COM. 518400 NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. >COM. 518400 NS J.GTLD-SERVERS.INTERNIC.NET. ><------------------------ >COM. 518400 NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. > -- Unsolicited commercial/propaganda email subject to legal action. Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), Sec.227(b)(1)(C), and Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a State may impose a fine of not less than $500 per message. Read the full text of Title 47 Sec 227 at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/227.html
|