North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Ascend GRF

  • From: Neil J. McRae
  • Date: Wed Jun 11 14:40:49 1997
  • Organisation: Domino

> I've been hearing conflicting stories about the Ascend GRF lately.
> Cisco claims that it doesn't really work as advertised in "realistic
> networks," but Ascend says this is because Cisco's routers melt down
> when the GRF feeds them routing table updates, so the GRF has to be
> throttled back to work in a mixed environment.
> Does anybody have any real experience here?  Any information, pointers,
> anecdotes, or wild rumors would help.
I'm using a GRF talking to a CISCO 7K over a DS-3 on ATM using
full BGP4 and route reflection and we've had no problems, other than
Ascends subtle changed to gated which are a little confusing.

The router is quite spectacular, Our backbone is 155M based and
so far the GRF hasn't had a single problem in over 3 weeks of testing.

The only thing that pisses me off about Ascend is that the documentation
could be better.

Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking.                            D O M I N O
[email protected]       NetBSD/sparc - 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor)
 Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>Computer!</A>