North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Current Round Table Delegates ?

  • From: Charles Sprickman
  • Date: Fri May 30 14:24:13 1997 
This is silly.  If this is sent to the nanog list (and I have yet to see a
clear reason why it is considered a service to post it here), the least
you can do is address your message to nanog...  ie:  "Hi, I am posting
this to NANOG because...".

I'm new to this list, and I'm disappointed that people are leaving due to
the flood of mail about nameserver "confederations".  I could really care
less about this until there is some clear agreement as to who gets the new
(e,u,alter)dns cash cow.  In the month I've been on this list, I've found
it to be extremely helpful, but recently, I hit "D" on way too many
messages.  It seems clear that no one wants to see this on the list, so
unless there is a demand, please stop cross-posting.  If I want to know
about developments in this area, I'll subscribe to the appropriate lists;
but please don't force me to by cc-ing these announcements here.  If I'm
out of line for posting, forgive me, but as a late-comer to the NANOG
list, these postings seem totally irrelevant.

Charles

~~~~~~~~~					     ~~~~~~~~~~~
Charles Sprickman 				Internet Channel
INCH System Administration Team		   	   (212)243-5200
[email protected]					 [email protected]


On Fri, 30 May 1997, Jim Fleming wrote:

>_Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 12:34:36 -0500
>_From: Jim Fleming <[email protected]>
>_To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
>_Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
>_Subject: Current Round Table Delegates ?
>_
>_
>_As the dust settles, it appears that one new
>_Root Name Server Confederation can be added
>_to the world Round Table. Hopefully, each Root
>_Name Server Confederation can present 2 delegates
>_to represent the confederation.
>_
>_Here are the likely candidates.
>_
>_=====================================
>_
>_AlterNIC - (4 servers)
>_........Eugene Kashpureff
>_........iPOC Member ??
>_
>_eDNS - (5 servers)
>_........Karl Denninger
>_........Chris Ambler
>_
>_InterNIC (9 servers - U.S. Government,  et. al.)
>_........Dr. Joseph Bordogna (NSF)
>_........William Schrader (PSI)
>_
>_name.space - (12 servers)
>_........Paul Garrin
>_........???
>_
>_NSI/ISI - (4 servers)
>_........Gabe Battista (NSI)
>_........Jon Postel (ISI)
>_
>_uDNS - (3 servers)
>_........Ron Kimball
>_........Richard Shu
>_
>_=====================================
>_
>_As these confederations take shape, these delegates
>_can help to bring synchronization between all of the
>_Root Name Server confederations so that collisions do
>_not occur in the TLD name space.
>_
>_So far, many of these delegates seem to be very responsive
>_to maintaining "synch". Of course some refuse to discuss
>_matters in public. The general public (via ISPs) will eventually
>_be able to select which Root Name Server Confederations
>_are working together to build a better Internet. The people
>_hiding in their ivory university towers will become irrelevant.
>_
>_--
>_Jim Fleming
>_Unir Corporation
>_http://www.Unir.Corp
>_
>_
>_

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -