|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Root Name Server Confederations
On Tue, 20 May 1997, Ben Black wrote: > > > > > > there are not multiple sets of root name servers. there is a set > > > of root name servers and a bunch of paranoid wierdos like jim fleming > > > who run servers who answer bogusly for "." and other domains. > > > > Again, the eDNS root servers are operational and resolve, albeit on a > > small percentage, are you willing to say this sytem does not work? > > > > their being operational makes them no less bogus. IANA says who answers > for "." and eDNS aint it. Not only is that restraint of trade, I would like to see you make that defense stay in a court outside of the US. > > > > > > > > Also, ISPs should become more familiar with where > > > > the following servers are located relative to your servers. > > > > There are many network tools which can help you make > > > > this assessment. > > > > > > there is no such choice. there is one set of root name servers and > > > if you don't use it the universe will garbage collect you and your > > > customers and your capital assets since you were clearly not destined > > > to survive. > > > > At this point this is blatant, malicious business interference... > > > > not to be confused with the blatant malicious business interference > caused by attempting to forcibly splinter the "." domain. > > what happens when there is disagreement in the eDNS community and someone > decides to break off and for Yet Another DNS Coalition? or are you > assuming such a thing will never happen? > > > > > Call us Robbin Hoods, we don't collect a salary for throwing accusations.... > > > > neither do i. eDNS is bound to produce nothing but confusion and headaches. > > > > > > > actual root name servers, but by their old names. > > > > Still like challenging your paycheque? > > > > InterNIC may be questionable technically and ethically, but they are > blessed by IANA currently. that is important because it eliminates the > confusion and headaches of getting dozens of different organizations > around the world to agree all the time. > > if there are multiple IANA blessed NICs, then so be it. they will > operate only as long as they follow the guidelines set down for them by a > higher authority with no financial stake in the game. > > > I should agree but they too are after what everyone wants.... > > > > everyone wants confusion and headaches? > > > > > Only because God, ahem.. you approve Paul. > > > > you mean since everyone involved in nameserver issues does exactly what > paul says or is that simple hyperbole to hide the lack of facts in your > argument? > > > I have to wonder if you have the resources to defend yourself from > > worldwide allegations of collusion and racketeering? > > > > yes, i'm sure there will be no legal action when there are 5 different > .web domains that refuse to cooperate with each other. > > > b3n > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|