|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IAHC Backtracks on Registrar Lottery
Isn't it confusing enough to deal with the InterNIC, let alone telling a customer "Oh yeah, well we registered it with registry number 27.." I can probably speak for a _lot_ of people when I say that we will probably continue to do business exclusively with the InterNIC, no matter how cheap the others are: The InterNIC has proven itself to me to be reliable, stable, and in the case where problems _do_ come up they're very responsive. They basically started the whole ballgame, why change? > On Wed, 7 May 1997, Cameo Wood wrote: > > > Citing "consistent and universal criticism," the IAHC announced that any > > service meeting financial and technical qualifications will be eligible > > to become a registrar. No lottery will be held. > > 1) URL, por favor? > > 2) So there will be an unlimited number of registrars? I thought that > everyone meeting the financial and technical qualifications was _already_ > eligible (if they applied), and that the lottery would determine which of > them _became_ registrars. > > Call me confused. > > __ > Todd Graham Lewis MindSpring Enterprises [email protected] > -- jamie g.k. rishaw <[email protected]@iagnet.net> Internet Access Group Chance favors the prepared mind. __ [http://www.iagnet.net] DID:216.902.5455 FAX:216.623.3566 \/ 800:800.637.4IAGx5455 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|