|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: offtopic for NANOG - do not read
On Saturday, April 26, 1997 3:22 PM, Dave Crocker[SMTP:[email protected]] wrote: @ At 12:40 PM -0700 4/26/97, Karl Denninger wrote: @ >For 90% of that database, the development and operation was paid for with @ >*private funds* as a *private, for-profit, revenue-funded* business. @ @ under a government agreement, with a government assignment of @ responsibility and government review and approval of the fees. @ @ the agreement, by the way, says that the data belong to the government. @ @ >NSI put up the risk capital to do this. They did so with no guarantee @ >of a profit, and in fact claim they have lost money. @ @ no, really they didn't, since the captial came from the revenue stream. @ The "capital" came much earlier than the charging.. March 1992 Original NSF Solicitation <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/solicitation.html> May 1992 Original NSI Proposal October 1992 Modified NSI Proposal <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/nis/proposal-toc.html> "Network Solutions believes NSF's objectives will be met most effectively by the award of the bulk of the services to a single contractor." <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/nis/sectionM.html> "Network Solutions proposes Mr. Jon Postel as the IANA Manager and Chairman of the Advisory Panel for the NREN NIS Manager project. He will provide services as an employee of USC's Information Sciences Institute (ISI), subcontractor to Network Solutions." AT&T Proposal <http://ds1.internic.net/internic.info/proposal/> January 1, 1993 InterNIC == (General Atomics + AT&T + NSI) Cooperative Agreements General Atomics (GA) ??? AT&T ??? Network Solutions, Inc. (NSI) <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/agreement/> Estimated Total Amount: $4,219,339 Effective Date: January 1, 1993 Expiration Date: September 30, 1998 <1993...period of "cooperation"..1994> General Atomics was supposed to be the NIC of NICs and to help coordinate the activities of all three contractors. More NICs were supposed to be formed. December 1994 Midterm Evaluation <http://www.rs.internic.net/nsf/review/review-toc.html> "The InterNIC awards set the precedent of requiring significant self-coordination among a team of awardees, and requiring outreach to other Network Information Centers. The panel suggests that the NSF critically consider whether it is viable to expect significant self-coordination among a team of awardees in future awards. The panel also notes that the NSF's program management was not able to correct GA's problems early on despite excellent efforts by the NSF staff, primarily because the NSF staff were overextended by monitoring at least two major projects (the InterNIC and the NSFNET backbone) at once. The panel recommends that for future large scale efforts in the rapidly changing Internet environment, the NSF should form an ongoing advisory panel of outside experts or employ some external consultants to help manage such cooperative agreements, rather than waiting two years to call for a review." December 1994 General Atomics Dismissed InterNIC == (AT&T + NSI) January 1995 NSF gives NSI more money... Amendment 1 <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/agreement/amendment1.html> This amendment increases the funds available under Cooperative Agreement No. NCR-9218742 by $1,258,457. NSI changes key personnel... Amendment 2 <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/agreement/amendment2.html> February-March 1995 (???estimated date???) SAIC purchases NSI http://www.saic.com http://www.netsol.com Circumstances, terms, previous owners....???? not known ???? May 1995 NSF gives NSI more money... AND reviews NSI's plan to start charging Amendment 3 <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/agreement/amendment3.html> "The National Science Foundation (NSF) hereby awards $1,948,632 to Network Solutions, Inc. for additional support..." September 13, 1995 NSF approves NSI's plan to charge for domain name registrations <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/agreement/amendment4.html> October 1995 Many people and companies debate the issues surrounding the commercialization of domain name registrations. The NSF and the IANA prevent commercial registries from having new Top Level Domains. November 1995 Debates December 1995 Debates January 1996 Debates February 1996 Debates and delays March 1996 Debates and delays April 1996 Debates and promises of plans May 1996 Debates and more promises of plans June 1996 ISOC Board of Trustees - ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Montreal, Quebec, Canada <http://www.isoc.org/trustees/96-004.htm> "RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Internet Society endorse in principle the proposal "New Registries and the Delegation of International Top Level Domains", dated June 1996 by Jon Postel, and approve the role assigned to the Internet Society in this proposal. The Board authorises Postel, in his IANA role, to refine the proposal to include a business plan for review and approval by the Board." July 1996 <http://www.verisign.com/pr/net_sol.html> NETWORK SOLUTIONS AND VERISIGN PROVIDE "ONE-STOP REGISTRATION" FOR INTERNET NAMING AND SECURITY Network Solutions to Make VeriSign Digital IDs SM Available with Domain Name Registration Debates and refinement of plans 8 - Intermiediate Version of New Registries Plan - Jon Postel <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/0518.html> 16 - Stop this silliness - Michael Dillon <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/1049.html> 16 - Issues on the table - Michael Dillon <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/1052.html> 16 - TLD registration with AlterNIC - Chris Ambler <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/1060.html 16 - Re: Issues on the table - Bill Manning <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/1118.html> 19 - Inside the IANA - Jim Fleming <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/1336.html> 29 - naughy pine - Bill Manning <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/2269.html> 30 - do I really want to do this? - Bill Manning <http://www.iiia.org/lists/newdom/current/2352.html> newdom mailing list closed at iiia.org - July 30th August 1996 Debates, meetings and claims of an October 1st start From CNET - IANA to take applications in October <http://www.ar.com/lists/newdom/0609.html> 8 - rolling over - Chris Ambler <http://www.ar.com/lists/newdom/0114.html> September 1996 Operational registries start to appear...the industry is ready... The IANA and the ISOC now claim an "ad hoc" committee is needed... ...more delays... October 1996 The balance of the Intellectual Infrastructure Fund is disclosed... <http://rs.internic.net/announcements/iif-update.html> "..through October 31, 1996, $8,542,200.00 has been deposited into the account." The Federal Networking Council Advisory Committee advises the NSF <http://www.fnc.gov/FNCAC_10_96_minutes.html> "The FNCAC reiterates and underscores the urgency of transferring responsibility for supporting U.S. commercial interests in ITLD administration from the NSF to an appropriate entity." November 1996 "...through November 30, 1996, $9,911,000.00 has been deposited into the account." Commercial TRUE Root Name Servers start to appear... the NSF does not allow commercial registries to have TLD entries in the Root Name Servers they control... The NSF awards USC/ISI $1.5 million <http://www.nsf.gov/ftp/awards96/awd9615/a9615927.txt> December 1996 "...through December 31, 1996: $12,685,450.00 has been desposited into the account." The ISOC's IAHC gets started to provide recommendations to IANA http://www.iahc.org NSI ends 1996 registering about 80,000 names per month which is an approximate gross revenue of $8,000,000 per month at $100 per registration. That covers the first 2 years. On an annual basis, this amounts to approximately $48,000,000 per year. January 1997 IAHC debates continue... Plans are announced by NSI to launch ARIN to charge for IP addresses <http://www.arin.net> NSF gives NSI more money... <http://rs.internic.net/nsf/agreement/amendment5.html> NSI and the IANA announce plans to deploy TRUE Root Name Servers February 1997 IAHC recommendations to the IANA finalized <http://www.iahc.org/draft-iahc-recommend-00.html> Commercial registries which are now fully operational are still restricted from having their names entered into the widely used Root Name Servers controlled by the National Science Foundation. Companies are now actively deploying commercial Root Name Servers to replace the NSF supported servers. February 27, 1997 I/O Design Announces Lawsuit <http://www.iahc.org/iahc-discuss/mail-archive/1815.html> <http://www.iodesign.com/complaint.html> OIG NSF InterNIC Report Complete - Awaiting Response February 28, 1997 Summary <http://www.iahc.org/iahc-discuss/mail-archive/1873.html> March 1997 First eDNS Meeting in Atlanta Georgia <http://www.edns.net> IAHC announces they are closing their mailing list IAHC and ITU announce supposed signers to MoU Some announce signers publicly withdraw April 1997 eDNS continues to grow and more TLD registries started Additional eDNS Root Servers being tested ISP/C announces they will not support the IAHC NSF announces it will not rebid the InterNIC contract < YOU ARE HERE> September 1998 Cooperative Agreement Ends... -- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation http://www.Unir.Corp Check out...http://www.Naperville.Mall - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |