North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Peering points

  • From: Avi Freedman
  • Date: Sun Apr 06 19:52:50 1997

Actually, it could well be that Sprint's having trouble there - but
Sprintlink has actually been amazingly stable there and at MAE-East
for the last 3-6 months.

But Sprint's always been screwy about Pennsauken...

Avi

> I'm not trying to imply anything, just that there is a current limit on
> customer connections there.  Your routing through Pennsauken seems to be
> pretty event free, so maybe Sprint simply wants the NAP to stay optimum
> and not overloaded.  This would be a Good Thing. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
> [email protected] (610) 289-1100  http://www.fast.net
> FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From:	Avi Freedman [SMTP:[email protected]]
> >Sent:	Sunday, April 06, 1997 7:27 PM
> >To:	Dave Van Allen
> >Cc:	[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> >Subject:	Re: Peering points
> >
> >Interesting...
> >We've seen the SprintNAP as a good place to send data to Sprintlink
> >and MCI - and UUNET, when we were peering with them there.
> >
> >Avi
> >
> >> FYI Sprint is not allowing anything larger than 6Mb from Pensauken,
> >> circa April 4, 1997, for customer connections that is.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> 
> >> David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
> >> [email protected] (610) 289-1100  http://www.fast.net
> >> FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions
> >> 
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From:	Avi Freedman [SMTP:[email protected]]
> >> >Sent:	Saturday, April 05, 1997 5:03 AM
> >> >To:	[email protected]
> >> >Cc:	[email protected]
> >> >Subject:	Re: Peering points
> >> >
> >> >> Or is the entire thing irrelevant, because everyone is moving to private
> >> >> bilateral connections.  And the important thing is how many providers
> >> >> does someone peer, not how many exchange points they're connected to.
> >> >> For the price of one Sprint-NAP connection, I can get several
> >>connections
> >> >> to Canada.  And we have a lot more customers in Canada than at the
> >> >> Sprint-NAP.  We already peer with everyone at the Sprint-NAP, or been
> >> >> turned down by them elsewhere.  So one more exchange point doesn't buy
> >> >> much.
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
> >> >>   Affiliation given for identification not representation
> >> >
> >> >The SprintNAP is a much less congested place than MAE-East (though most
> >> >providers also have less capacity out of it [besides Sprintlink, GSL,
> >> >ICM, etc...])...
> >> >
> >> >Avi
> >> >
> >> 
> >
> 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -