North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Peering points
Interesting... We've seen the SprintNAP as a good place to send data to Sprintlink and MCI - and UUNET, when we were peering with them there. Avi > FYI Sprint is not allowing anything larger than 6Mb from Pensauken, > circa April 4, 1997, for customer connections that is. > > Best regards, > > David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm) > [email protected] (610) 289-1100 http://www.fast.net > FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Avi Freedman [SMTP:[email protected]] > >Sent: Saturday, April 05, 1997 5:03 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Peering points > > > >> Or is the entire thing irrelevant, because everyone is moving to private > >> bilateral connections. And the important thing is how many providers > >> does someone peer, not how many exchange points they're connected to. > >> For the price of one Sprint-NAP connection, I can get several connections > >> to Canada. And we have a lot more customers in Canada than at the > >> Sprint-NAP. We already peer with everyone at the Sprint-NAP, or been > >> turned down by them elsewhere. So one more exchange point doesn't buy > >> much. > >> -- > >> Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO > >> Affiliation given for identification not representation > > > >The SprintNAP is a much less congested place than MAE-East (though most > >providers also have less capacity out of it [besides Sprintlink, GSL, > >ICM, etc...])... > > > >Avi > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|