|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical ARIN mail
i apologize for further increasing the S/N of this list.. but I believe the '[email protected]' list was created to focus on ARIN discussions, among other things. as we all know, NANOG's charter is defined in murky terms, but why continue a retorical debate on two lists? thanks. -jh- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 97 14:12 PST From: Michael Gersten <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected] Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: ARINANOG Jim raises an extremely good point. Why not start ARIN off by giving it a /8 to work with and see how well it will actually work? Lets face it, there is only ONE /0, and giving that to ARIN might not be a good idea if it doesn't work right. By giving them a /8, they will have to compete with other ways of assigning IP addresses, and demonstrate that they actually can work. Just like a would-be ISP has to start with a /24 and work up... Michael - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|