North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Domain Rant.
Karl Denninger writes: > On Fri, Mar 21, 1997 at 12:07:54PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > > > Karl Denninger writes: > > > No it doesn't. > > > > > > If you register with someone, pay them, and they claim never to have > > > received payment you're just as screwed. > > > > No, you aren't. Today, if someone does that, you are stuck. > > Boiled down: You pay again. > > > In the new > > model, you will be able to switch to another registrar. Competition, > > you know. > > Boiled down: You pay again. > > What was that difference again? > > I know you're good at trying to avoid facts, but this is rediculous! Cute, but we both know that you are avoiding the point. Here's the point, in three sentences: a. There is very little than can be done about companies providing substandard service, or even screwing you over, when they have a monopolistic stranglehold on you. b. In your "eDNS" model, registrars have this stranglehold on you, because you you cannot switch to the services of a newer (better) registrar without having to also change domain names. c. With the IAHC plan, if a registrar is providing unsatisfactory service, you can switch registrars, while keeping the same domain name. -SteveK -- Steve Kann i/o 360 digital design 841 Broadway, Suite 502 PGP 1024/C0145E05 F2 D6 24 83 9E 52 9A 61 AA BB 97 61 5C A1 B8 CE Personal:[email protected] Business: [email protected] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|