North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Big providers use NAT to squeeze little ISPs
I see that you've no interest in defending the accusations you so wildly make. I'll go back to my life of ad-hominen attacks and mistyping of access lists. At least I'm honest about it. -alan > > > I will restart my question as such: > > > > It is my understanding that; > > > > One of your principal objections to NAT boxes is that they are > > motivated by technical and trade practices you find dishonest. > > > > Please define and expound. > > My principal objection to NAT is that it breaks lots of things, including > some servers, that customers want to put on their networks. > > At the PROVIDER level, especially at the level we run at, there is no NAT > box made fast enough to do the job regardless of price. > > > Do you really think that big ISP puts in /19 filters to make life > > hard for the "little guy" at the bottom of the "money pile"? > > > > -alan > > As long as a provider can get their own /19 I have no problem with > prefix filtering at the /19 level. > > The problem comes about when big ISPs filter at /19s *AND* the allocators > of space refuse to give ISPs /19s. > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|