North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BGP announcements and small providers
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Adrian Bool wrote: > On Wed 26 Feb, Matt Ranney wrote: > > As it is, if the interface-defaulted squid machine was dual-homed to > > providers X and Y that don't peer, a customer of X could get the A > > record for the interface in Y's space. The client would then have to > > take the transit path between X and Y, which for many X's and Y's, > > sucks. > > You could take in all the BGP data from your providers (read-only as it > were) then link that into your DNS server so that it returns an IP > address according to the 'best' (however you define that...) route > that you have back to them...? > > aid > I think the whole purpose t Paul V's madness in creating this solution was to avoid doing just that. Also I seem to remember something in Paul's take that took care of this situation. Maybe he can elaborate. Geoff White Virtual Sites [email protected] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|