North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
On Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:58:50 EST "John W. Stewart III" <[email protected]> wrote: > so talk to your provider about deploying it, don't bash > cisco who has already rolled new images sigh. > > and on the point of providers, do you really think they > would continue to run code that causes them problems > (whether cisco calls it a "bug" or an "optimization")? > if providers thought it was a bug, then they would have > anxiously awaited an announcement for an image that had > the fix so that they could deploy it > You'd be amazed. Doing a router upgrade isn't a simple quick 5 second thing to do. That has to be planned, and if people see it as bugfix they are more likely to upgrade. I used to keep 1 weeks worth of BGP4 logs for all of my employers peers, now I can't keep 1 hours because of all the _crap_ I recieve from their routers. Regards, Neil. -- Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. Domino: In the glow of the night. [email protected] NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|