|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:32:03 -0500 "Justin W. Newton" <[email protected]> wrote: > A BGP withdrawl for a route which is not in the routing table does not > cause the router to update any routes and is hence not a routing update. > I.e. removing a route that isn't there is not very processor intensive. Thats irrelevent, what it is doing is _broken_ and it should be fixed and implemented. Neil. -- Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. Domino: In the glow of the night. [email protected] NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|