|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Non-profit IP Registry
Begin forwarded message: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Daryn D. Fisher <oz> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 97 23:13:29 -0700 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Non-profit IP Registry cc: [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] That is why: " The Advisory Council is to act on behalf of the membership on all issues including, but not limited to: _ Registry goals _ Future funding _ Allocation policy guidelines _ Training _ Nominations for Advisory Council _ Database maintenance _ Registry procedures " and: "ARIN members will nominate candidates for the the Advisory Council." This allows: "The point has also been made that the management of the IP space should be put in the hands of those that depend on it - the users. Whether those users are ISPs, corporate entities, universities, etc., they should all play a role." BTW, let's move this to the NAIPR list. > There is a VERY serious flaw in this plan. > > The effective pricing drops with size. Yet the registry is >technically required to be stingy in its IP allocations. > > Can you say "lawsuit"? I knew you could. > > Imagine if ivory sold large bars and small bars and the small >bars were more cost effective. Then they would only sell you a small bar >because you wouldn't need the large bar for a few months, thus causing >you to pay more. > > Think about it. > > David Schwartz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|