North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Which RFC?

  • From: Neil J. McRae
  • Date: Thu Jan 02 11:01:03 1997

On Thu, 02 Jan 1997 15:16:54 +0000 
 "Alex.Bligh" <[email protected]> alleged:

> Anyone know *which* RFC says a packets should be routed using the
> most specific route in a routing table, not (for instance) the first
> route in the table that matches, or, for instance, using a less specific
> route that has a better metric? This is so basic I hardly
> know where to find it, but I have a (for the time being anonymous)
> systems vendor who really prefers the way their kernel does it ....
> Oddly enough it doesn't work well with subnetting.
> 
I had a similar problem and this is what I found from 1812 this was just
a brief look...

E.3 Some Route Lookup Algorithms

      This section examines several route lookup algorithms that are in
      use or have been proposed.  Each is described by giving the
      sequence of pruning rules it uses.  The strengths and weaknesses
      of each algorithm are presented

E.3.1 The Revised Classic Algorithm

      The Revised Classic Algorithm is the form of the traditional
      algorithm that was discussed in Section [E.1].  The steps of this
      algorithm are:

      1.  Basic match
      2.  Longest match
      3.  Best metric
      4.  Policy


Neil
--  
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.          E A S Y N E T  G R O U P  P L C 
[email protected]        NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) 
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/";>computer!</A>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -