North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BGP and memory size
7206s need 64MB, in my experience, to take even one full view. 4x00s are more than fine. Something about I/O memory allocation, though even *that* doesn't fully explain it. The box seems to perform very well as a super-POP router, however. Avi > I hope the smiley face was omitted accidentally! > > The bug report was junked (by the way, we don't junk legitimate > bug reports) because the router in question was a 7200 with 32M > of memory taking full routing from several peers. It simply > didn't have enough memory. There was no evidence of a memory leak. > Needless to say, if there had been a leak, it would have > had high priority. > > The gent who opened the bug report in the first place was > "unfamiliar" with the environment. :-) > > Robert. > > Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > > > Perhaps Cisco is just trying to force us to buy more memory: > > > > ID: 79764 > > Feature-set: bgp > > Title: Memory Leak in BGP Router process > > Reported: 11.1(7) 11.2(2) > > State: J > > > > There appears to be a Memory Leak in BGP Router Process. > > > > Notice the State. It is J - which stands for Junked - which means they > > will not fix this since it isn't viewed as an important problem. > > > > Hank > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|