North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BGP and memory size
I hope the smiley face was omitted accidentally! The bug report was junked (by the way, we don't junk legitimate bug reports) because the router in question was a 7200 with 32M of memory taking full routing from several peers. It simply didn't have enough memory. There was no evidence of a memory leak. Needless to say, if there had been a leak, it would have had high priority. The gent who opened the bug report in the first place was "unfamiliar" with the environment. :-) Robert. Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > Perhaps Cisco is just trying to force us to buy more memory: > > ID: 79764 > Feature-set: bgp > Title: Memory Leak in BGP Router process > Reported: 11.1(7) 11.2(2) > State: J > > There appears to be a Memory Leak in BGP Router Process. > > Notice the State. It is J - which stands for Junked - which means they > will not fix this since it isn't viewed as an important problem. > > Hank - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|